{"observation":{"id":"8340c79d-88de-4721-9c3e-c58e057071fb","tool":"fathom","tool_name":"Fathom","criterion":"action-item-extraction","criterion_name":"Action-Item Extraction","criterion_definition":"Finds the real action items, ideally with owner and due date, with low false positives.","criterion_evidence_type":"transformation","criterion_rank_role":"decisive","criterion_rank_role_reason":"Finding the real action items is a central outcome readers are hiring the tool for, not just a convenience feature. (3 of 3 judges)","scenario":"ai-demos-daily-standup-31-july-2026","scenario_name":"AI Demos Daily Standup — 31 July 2026","group_tag":"ai-meeting-notetaker","scenario_description":"A real 25-minute technical engineering daily standup with 14 attendees and about 10 active speakers, used as the single parallel-capture meeting for evaluating AI meeting notetakers on transcription, diarization, summaries, action items, search/chat, and collaboration features.","modality":"image","input_text":null,"input_artifact_refs":[{"alt":null,"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/547dd6f13e4a420fa8ad7bf2c88c7612.png?v=1","role":"input","filename":"31-july-meeting-screenshot.png"}],"stresses":["Transcription accuracy for real names, tool names, numbers, and technical jargon","Speaker diarization across multiple active speakers","Robustness to overlapping speech, crosstalk, and rapid turn-taking","Join reliability for bot-based and botless capture","Summary quality on identical source material","Action-item extraction with correct owners and commitments","Topic segmentation of standup updates","Search and chat grounded in the meeting content","Sharing, API, MCP, integrations, plan limits, languages, and privacy feature coverage"],"verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Fathom extracts real commitments into an ACTION ITEMS section with owner attribution; the published output shows timestamped tasks and a named owner on the item.","evidence_state":"verified","source":null,"artifacts":[{"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/9e8a3e7fb669448e959de254a7dcec48.png?v=1","role":"output","alt":null},{"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/4474396fc7b64bcc8cb5f825f19141ff.png?v=1","role":"output","alt":null}],"run_id":"ace58582-3d1e-48ee-996c-9b3cd03f27a2","study_title":"AI Meeting Notetakers — Capture Accurate Transcripts, Summaries & Action Items From Live Calls","study_kind":"generation","research_task":"86baxegnv","tested_at":null,"completeness":"input-and-output","input":{"state":"files","text":null,"files":[{"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/547dd6f13e4a420fa8ad7bf2c88c7612.png?v=1","filename":"31-july-meeting-screenshot.png","alt":"AI Demos Daily Standup — 31 July 2026","role":"input"}],"modality":"image","stresses":["Transcription accuracy for real names, tool names, numbers, and technical jargon","Speaker diarization across multiple active speakers","Robustness to overlapping speech, crosstalk, and rapid turn-taking","Join reliability for bot-based and botless capture","Summary quality on identical source material","Action-item extraction with correct owners and commitments","Topic segmentation of standup updates","Search and chat grounded in the meeting content","Sharing, API, MCP, integrations, plan limits, languages, and privacy feature coverage"]},"tool_page_slug":"fathom","tool_url":"https://aidemos.com/tools/fathom","permalink":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/8340c79d-88de-4721-9c3e-c58e057071fb","api_url":"https://ai.aidemos.com/v1/observations/8340c79d-88de-4721-9c3e-c58e057071fb"},"peers":[{"id":"21587b7d-dc6e-4aa1-8ee4-4e5f13641a3e","tool":"fellow","tool_name":"Fellow","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Action-item extraction was mostly correct, with real commitments and proper owner assignment for most items, but one real action item was misplaced from Mahreen to Anshika; the report states a 95%+ capture rate.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/2f38a356a98d4395b43001c1d7f6c5b3.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/21587b7d-dc6e-4aa1-8ee4-4e5f13641a3e"},{"id":"737cde44-da22-4dd6-b985-62104c4d14a8","tool":"fireflies-ai","tool_name":"Fireflies.ai","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Grouped action items by owner, attributed them to the correct team member, and exposed a clickable source timestamp (19:13) for at least one item.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/bd68b01019254a5380cf234ec8ab89a1.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/737cde44-da22-4dd6-b985-62104c4d14a8"},{"id":"9af81f24-1ac8-4a6a-b543-1959eafc22b0","tool":"granola","tool_name":"Granola","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Granola extracts concrete next steps with ownership: the visible action item says to create a subtask and add details, names Mahreen Fathima as owner, and marks the item for same-day follow-up; the report says the extracted list contained no false positives.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/0a21e41b32d648b1b5206dc034a58201.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/9af81f24-1ac8-4a6a-b543-1959eafc22b0"},{"id":"a3626a76-5657-440e-9460-f49e46ad880b","tool":"happyscribe","tool_name":"HappyScribe","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It extracted the real action item about updating logs, but owner attribution was wrong because the misheard name cascaded into the action item and showed 'Nadine' instead of 'Mahreen.'","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/672943809b1d40c483bdee07651023c2.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/a3626a76-5657-440e-9460-f49e46ad880b"},{"id":"dfeacb85-baa0-4c8b-a44e-e4a7b005d54f","tool":"meetgeek","tool_name":"MeetGeek","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It extracts real commitments as action items rather than noise; the report says all extracted items had correct ownership and timing, and the visible note includes an owned action item with timestamp 19:51.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/39691e7c2e9141b3aac5a412f3bb110d.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/dfeacb85-baa0-4c8b-a44e-e4a7b005d54f"},{"id":"1b0800ea-3b02-4159-88c1-ed437a0b12a7","tool":"notta","tool_name":"Notta","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The action-item list extracted the real commitments from the call, formatted them as checkbox items with @mentions, and the report says owner assignment was correct with no false positives.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/22b60eda9b5e4b05b6ad287c471e5e3c.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/1b0800ea-3b02-4159-88c1-ed437a0b12a7"},{"id":"914e606f-d39b-4941-8b42-0f3b3653ee40","tool":"otter-ai","tool_name":"Otter.ai","verdict":"struggled","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter extracted action items, including at least one due-today API-related task with an assignee, but the report says most items were left without an owner and duplicate entries also appeared, so the output needed manual cleanup before delegation.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/7e0a51fd2a4744aea043309aec25fc20.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/914e606f-d39b-4941-8b42-0f3b3653ee40"}],"other_criteria":[{"id":"070f7f5f-046c-4139-a132-6e00a3b57acc","criterion":"chat-with-notes-ask-questions","criterion_name":"Chat with Notes / Ask Questions","rank_role":"context","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Ask Fathom answers direct factual questions from the meeting notes with grounded references; for one query it answered that a call was scheduled for 6th August and linked the supporting transcript mention.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/070f7f5f-046c-4139-a132-6e00a3b57acc"},{"id":"64cce11b-7973-439a-bcc1-68219903d5eb","criterion":"join-method-reliability","criterion_name":"Join Method & Reliability","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The bot joined Google Meet successfully and stayed connected for the full ~25-minute call, with no mid-call disconnections or plan-limit cutoffs.","artifact_count":5,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/64cce11b-7973-439a-bcc1-68219903d5eb"},{"id":"79d2b9bb-26b6-4b8e-858a-25c5849095c9","criterion":"search-across-notes","criterion_name":"Search Across Notes","rank_role":"context","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Transcript search supports keyword lookup and returns a matched snippet for \"API,\" surfacing the relevant moment and the linked action item \"Create subtasks for API benchmarking; tag Divya on completion.\"","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/79d2b9bb-26b6-4b8e-858a-25c5849095c9"},{"id":"e9695d25-df6e-448b-b185-4ad01e885bdf","criterion":"speaker-diarization","criterion_name":"Speaker Diarization","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Fathom separates most speakers correctly in a busy multi-speaker standup, but the report observed one rapid-transition segment where two speakers' lines were merged into a single speaker block.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/e9695d25-df6e-448b-b185-4ad01e885bdf"},{"id":"53731c87-42c6-49f3-b19d-6a3ab5fe169e","criterion":"summary-quality","criterion_name":"Summary Quality","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Fathom produces a skimmable written recap with named sections such as Meeting Purpose, Key Takeaways, and Topics; the report describes the summary as structured and concise.","artifact_count":3,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/53731c87-42c6-49f3-b19d-6a3ab5fe169e"},{"id":"46b5c695-1c28-461a-ad98-573516adf29f","criterion":"topic-segmentation","criterion_name":"Topic Segmentation","rank_role":"context","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Fathom breaks the standup into named topical sections instead of one blob, including headers like \"Process & System Blockers\" and \"Content Quality & Review Process.\"","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/46b5c695-1c28-461a-ad98-573516adf29f"},{"id":"1c4f4fe3-3ed8-490d-992b-a25ddd604669","criterion":"transcription-accuracy","criterion_name":"Transcription Accuracy","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Fathom's transcript mostly preserves the meeting's names and technical content, but the report records one confirmed name-level error: \"Mahreen\" was rendered as \"Meryl.\"","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/1c4f4fe3-3ed8-490d-992b-a25ddd604669"}],"appears_in":[{"page_type":"ranking","slug":"ai-meeting-notetakers","title":"Best AI Meeting Notetakers for Accurate Transcripts, Summaries, and Action Items","url":"https://aidemos.com/best/ai-meeting-notetakers","binding":"run"}],"same_scenario":[{"id":"21587b7d-dc6e-4aa1-8ee4-4e5f13641a3e","tool":"fellow","tool_name":"Fellow","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Action-item extraction was mostly correct, with real commitments and proper owner assignment for most items, but one real action item was misplaced from Mahreen to Anshika; the report states a 95%+ capture rate."},{"id":"737cde44-da22-4dd6-b985-62104c4d14a8","tool":"fireflies-ai","tool_name":"Fireflies.ai","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Grouped action items by owner, attributed them to the correct team member, and exposed a clickable source timestamp (19:13) for at least one item."},{"id":"9af81f24-1ac8-4a6a-b543-1959eafc22b0","tool":"granola","tool_name":"Granola","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Granola extracts concrete next steps with ownership: the visible action item says to create a subtask and add details, names Mahreen Fathima as owner, and marks the item for same-day follow-up; the report says the extracted list contained no false positives."},{"id":"a3626a76-5657-440e-9460-f49e46ad880b","tool":"happyscribe","tool_name":"HappyScribe","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It extracted the real action item about updating logs, but owner attribution was wrong because the misheard name cascaded into the action item and showed 'Nadine' instead of 'Mahreen.'"},{"id":"dfeacb85-baa0-4c8b-a44e-e4a7b005d54f","tool":"meetgeek","tool_name":"MeetGeek","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It extracts real commitments as action items rather than noise; the report says all extracted items had correct ownership and timing, and the visible note includes an owned action item with timestamp 19:51."},{"id":"1b0800ea-3b02-4159-88c1-ed437a0b12a7","tool":"notta","tool_name":"Notta","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The action-item list extracted the real commitments from the call, formatted them as checkbox items with @mentions, and the report says owner assignment was correct with no false positives."},{"id":"914e606f-d39b-4941-8b42-0f3b3653ee40","tool":"otter-ai","tool_name":"Otter.ai","verdict":"struggled","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter extracted action items, including at least one due-today API-related task with an assignee, but the report says most items were left without an owner and duplicate entries also appeared, so the output needed manual cleanup before delegation."}]}