{"observation":{"id":"85b52298-f079-4410-b519-3fc1d34593a0","tool":"otter-ai","tool_name":"Otter.ai","criterion":"summary-quality","criterion_name":"Summary Quality","criterion_definition":"Captures decisions and key points, is structured and skimmable, and drops nothing important.","criterion_evidence_type":"transformation","criterion_rank_role":"decisive","criterion_rank_role_reason":"The product is being judged on whether it produces a useful meeting summary that preserves key decisions and points without missing important content. (3 of 3 judges)","scenario":"ai-demos-daily-standup-31-july-2026","scenario_name":"AI Demos Daily Standup — 31 July 2026","group_tag":"ai-meeting-notetaker","scenario_description":"A real 25-minute technical engineering daily standup with 14 attendees and about 10 active speakers, used as the single parallel-capture meeting for evaluating AI meeting notetakers on transcription, diarization, summaries, action items, search/chat, and collaboration features.","modality":"image","input_text":null,"input_artifact_refs":[{"alt":null,"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/547dd6f13e4a420fa8ad7bf2c88c7612.png?v=1","role":"input","filename":"31-july-meeting-screenshot.png"}],"stresses":["Transcription accuracy for real names, tool names, numbers, and technical jargon","Speaker diarization across multiple active speakers","Robustness to overlapping speech, crosstalk, and rapid turn-taking","Join reliability for bot-based and botless capture","Summary quality on identical source material","Action-item extraction with correct owners and commitments","Topic segmentation of standup updates","Search and chat grounded in the meeting content","Sharing, API, MCP, integrations, plan limits, languages, and privacy feature coverage"],"verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter produced a clear, structured meeting summary that the report says covered the key decisions and discussion points without dropping anything important, and the summary page loaded with organized sections like Overview and Action Items.","evidence_state":"verified","source":null,"artifacts":[{"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/fb9982daf5bf4988b132cda637bf3053.png?v=1","role":"output","alt":null},{"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/4d7e1d05abc440cea67500433ef3f854.png?v=1","role":"output","alt":null},{"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/1d0cb5c9e5254e9e8459c2f2c109f807.png?v=1","role":"output","alt":null}],"run_id":"ace58582-3d1e-48ee-996c-9b3cd03f27a2","study_title":"AI Meeting Notetakers — Capture Accurate Transcripts, Summaries & Action Items From Live Calls","study_kind":"generation","research_task":"86baxegnv","tested_at":null,"completeness":"input-and-output","input":{"state":"files","text":null,"files":[{"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/547dd6f13e4a420fa8ad7bf2c88c7612.png?v=1","filename":"31-july-meeting-screenshot.png","alt":"AI Demos Daily Standup — 31 July 2026","role":"input"}],"modality":"image","stresses":["Transcription accuracy for real names, tool names, numbers, and technical jargon","Speaker diarization across multiple active speakers","Robustness to overlapping speech, crosstalk, and rapid turn-taking","Join reliability for bot-based and botless capture","Summary quality on identical source material","Action-item extraction with correct owners and commitments","Topic segmentation of standup updates","Search and chat grounded in the meeting content","Sharing, API, MCP, integrations, plan limits, languages, and privacy feature coverage"]},"tool_page_slug":"otter-ai","tool_url":"https://aidemos.com/tools/otter-ai","permalink":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/85b52298-f079-4410-b519-3fc1d34593a0","api_url":"https://ai.aidemos.com/v1/observations/85b52298-f079-4410-b519-3fc1d34593a0"},"peers":[{"id":"53731c87-42c6-49f3-b19d-6a3ab5fe169e","tool":"fathom","tool_name":"Fathom","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Fathom produces a skimmable written recap with named sections such as Meeting Purpose, Key Takeaways, and Topics; the report describes the summary as structured and concise.","artifact_count":3,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/7a6b7c6bede341b1a0f8d941ba783549.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/53731c87-42c6-49f3-b19d-6a3ab5fe169e"},{"id":"d89239cd-ae18-4967-90d8-e968276badf1","tool":"fellow","tool_name":"Fellow","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The meeting recap was reported as clearly structured and complete, with the key decisions and discussion points preserved and nothing important dropped.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/e4f4726c9f8b4d8e9ec8e58a8faf8a3a.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/d89239cd-ae18-4967-90d8-e968276badf1"},{"id":"2811037e-c564-48ad-a195-593c4e2ed1ea","tool":"fireflies-ai","tool_name":"Fireflies.ai","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Produced a structured notes summary with a named header ('Task Status and Issue Resolution') rather than a blob, and the report says the full summary was multi-section and did not drop important points.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/791c17668df346a1aac4a7f11d716715.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/2811037e-c564-48ad-a195-593c4e2ed1ea"},{"id":"d9b8082d-37a5-4e94-8412-e2a6d59d4aa3","tool":"granola","tool_name":"Granola","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Granola produces skimmable summaries with named sections; the meeting output is organized into at least three top-level sections, including Use Case Status and Review Progress, Tool Research and Publishing, and Access Tracker Updates.","artifact_count":4,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/eed3e4d591e047e2990d9327d214923e.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/d9b8082d-37a5-4e94-8412-e2a6d59d4aa3"},{"id":"ab6fc227-dfb2-4524-a6ab-83adb117660f","tool":"happyscribe","tool_name":"HappyScribe","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The summary can hallucinate a person name: the report says it substituted 'Nadine' for 'Mahreen' in a summary bullet, creating a false team-member attribution.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/ac13349047eb4335af7ffc2f1f798d7e.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/ab6fc227-dfb2-4524-a6ab-83adb117660f"},{"id":"b482399a-b91b-4aaa-b6f1-a56363792548","tool":"meetgeek","tool_name":"MeetGeek","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It produces a clear, skimmable meeting summary with topic organization and a Next Steps section, and the report says it preserved the major decisions and discussion points.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/348b3c4459f34fe8b0214debd8e0998b.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/b482399a-b91b-4aaa-b6f1-a56363792548"},{"id":"aa85bfe2-42ee-4df2-b89f-831056fd4fc3","tool":"notta","tool_name":"Notta","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The generated meeting summary was comprehensive and skimmable, with structured sections such as Task & Issue Management and a mindmap-style organization that reflected the meeting flow.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/6868c5d787734044ae365ce951e12c06.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/aa85bfe2-42ee-4df2-b89f-831056fd4fc3"}],"other_criteria":[{"id":"914e606f-d39b-4941-8b42-0f3b3653ee40","criterion":"action-item-extraction","criterion_name":"Action-Item Extraction","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"struggled","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter extracted action items, including at least one due-today API-related task with an assignee, but the report says most items were left without an owner and duplicate entries also appeared, so the output needed manual cleanup before delegation.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/914e606f-d39b-4941-8b42-0f3b3653ee40"},{"id":"295ea299-5f4d-480e-8ff7-36708e2bc9f7","criterion":"chat-with-notes-ask-questions","criterion_name":"Chat with Notes / Ask Questions","rank_role":"context","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter’s AI Chat answered meeting questions with a grounded response and a specific timestamp, and the report says the answers were cited and free of hallucinations in the tested queries.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/295ea299-5f4d-480e-8ff7-36708e2bc9f7"},{"id":"0364fbbc-9644-47cc-97a6-60174baab699","criterion":"editability","criterion_name":"Editability","rank_role":"context","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter exposes inline editing controls for transcript and summary outputs before sharing, so wrong content can be corrected in-product rather than only exported as-is.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/0364fbbc-9644-47cc-97a6-60174baab699"},{"id":"1ec8c4c4-913b-4e17-8150-83589c5c2f7b","criterion":"join-method-reliability","criterion_name":"Join Method & Reliability","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter’s bot joined Google Meet successfully and stayed connected through the full ~25-minute call with no mid-call dropout or ejection, so the meeting was captured end to end.","artifact_count":3,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/1ec8c4c4-913b-4e17-8150-83589c5c2f7b"},{"id":"68c18886-3c73-4ed3-bd68-92814dc4b10b","criterion":"search-across-notes","criterion_name":"Search Across Notes","rank_role":"context","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter does not show a direct transcript keyword-search workflow in the transcript view; lookup is routed through AI Chat instead, where a natural-language timestamp question returned a specific answer at 0:07:06.","artifact_count":3,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/68c18886-3c73-4ed3-bd68-92814dc4b10b"},{"id":"bc9e6d91-ebd3-4a9e-99eb-5cc194791f45","criterion":"sharing-without-registration","criterion_name":"Sharing Without Registration","rank_role":"context","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"A shared meeting transcript opened without requiring sign-in, exposing the meeting title, metadata, and transcript snippets; the share dialog also offers restricted access and link-copy controls.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/bc9e6d91-ebd3-4a9e-99eb-5cc194791f45"},{"id":"9552a2b6-0bc3-4802-8f1b-f9cf98c13b46","criterion":"speaker-diarization","criterion_name":"Speaker Diarization","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter’s diarization was effectively unusable in this multi-speaker standup: only 1 of about 10 active speakers was identified by name, while the other 9 were left as generic labels or unattributed, which the report summarizes as a 90% failure rate.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/9552a2b6-0bc3-4802-8f1b-f9cf98c13b46"},{"id":"eedc69a7-0929-4cbd-a001-6122eed42379","criterion":"topic-segmentation","criterion_name":"Topic Segmentation","rank_role":"context","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter broke the standup into useful topic sections rather than one blob, with named headings such as Issue Task Assignments and Status Updates and Error Resolution and Task Link Sharing, making the summary skimmable.","artifact_count":3,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/eedc69a7-0929-4cbd-a001-6122eed42379"},{"id":"0efa5738-c840-44ba-a72a-b35d289e70fb","criterion":"transcription-accuracy","criterion_name":"Transcription Accuracy","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter generated a full transcript for the standup and, per the report, captured names, tool names, jargon, and numbers correctly with minimal errors, making the transcript reliable for reference.","artifact_count":3,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/0efa5738-c840-44ba-a72a-b35d289e70fb"}],"appears_in":[{"page_type":"ranking","slug":"ai-meeting-notetakers","title":"Best AI Meeting Notetakers for Accurate Transcripts, Summaries, and Action Items","url":"https://aidemos.com/best/ai-meeting-notetakers","binding":"run"}],"same_scenario":[{"id":"53731c87-42c6-49f3-b19d-6a3ab5fe169e","tool":"fathom","tool_name":"Fathom","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Fathom produces a skimmable written recap with named sections such as Meeting Purpose, Key Takeaways, and Topics; the report describes the summary as structured and concise."},{"id":"d89239cd-ae18-4967-90d8-e968276badf1","tool":"fellow","tool_name":"Fellow","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The meeting recap was reported as clearly structured and complete, with the key decisions and discussion points preserved and nothing important dropped."},{"id":"2811037e-c564-48ad-a195-593c4e2ed1ea","tool":"fireflies-ai","tool_name":"Fireflies.ai","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Produced a structured notes summary with a named header ('Task Status and Issue Resolution') rather than a blob, and the report says the full summary was multi-section and did not drop important points."},{"id":"d9b8082d-37a5-4e94-8412-e2a6d59d4aa3","tool":"granola","tool_name":"Granola","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Granola produces skimmable summaries with named sections; the meeting output is organized into at least three top-level sections, including Use Case Status and Review Progress, Tool Research and Publishing, and Access Tracker Updates."},{"id":"ab6fc227-dfb2-4524-a6ab-83adb117660f","tool":"happyscribe","tool_name":"HappyScribe","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The summary can hallucinate a person name: the report says it substituted 'Nadine' for 'Mahreen' in a summary bullet, creating a false team-member attribution."},{"id":"b482399a-b91b-4aaa-b6f1-a56363792548","tool":"meetgeek","tool_name":"MeetGeek","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It produces a clear, skimmable meeting summary with topic organization and a Next Steps section, and the report says it preserved the major decisions and discussion points."},{"id":"aa85bfe2-42ee-4df2-b89f-831056fd4fc3","tool":"notta","tool_name":"Notta","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The generated meeting summary was comprehensive and skimmable, with structured sections such as Task & Issue Management and a mindmap-style organization that reflected the meeting flow."}]}