{"observation":{"id":"9080d7d0-7707-4182-b68c-0e1f61c09488","tool":"fireflies-ai","tool_name":"Fireflies.ai","criterion":"chat-with-notes-ask-questions","criterion_name":"Chat with Notes / Ask Questions","criterion_definition":"Gives grounded answers with the cited moment and admits when unknown.","criterion_evidence_type":"transformation","criterion_rank_role":"context","criterion_rank_role_reason":"Q&A over notes is useful, but it is an add-on to the capture and summarization job rather than a core measure of it. (3 of 3 judges)","scenario":"ai-demos-daily-standup-31-july-2026","scenario_name":"AI Demos Daily Standup — 31 July 2026","group_tag":"ai-meeting-notetaker","scenario_description":"A real 25-minute technical engineering daily standup with 14 attendees and about 10 active speakers, used as the single parallel-capture meeting for evaluating AI meeting notetakers on transcription, diarization, summaries, action items, search/chat, and collaboration features.","modality":"image","input_text":null,"input_artifact_refs":[{"alt":null,"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/547dd6f13e4a420fa8ad7bf2c88c7612.png?v=1","role":"input","filename":"31-july-meeting-screenshot.png"}],"stresses":["Transcription accuracy for real names, tool names, numbers, and technical jargon","Speaker diarization across multiple active speakers","Robustness to overlapping speech, crosstalk, and rapid turn-taking","Join reliability for bot-based and botless capture","Summary quality on identical source material","Action-item extraction with correct owners and commitments","Topic segmentation of standup updates","Search and chat grounded in the meeting content","Sharing, API, MCP, integrations, plan limits, languages, and privacy feature coverage"],"verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"AskFred answered a natural-language question with a specific grounded response ('August 6th') and relevant context, with no hallucination reported in the tested query.","evidence_state":"verified","source":null,"artifacts":[{"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/5d6339008cea4142b2733ccea5fe3c23.png?v=1","role":"output","alt":null}],"run_id":"ace58582-3d1e-48ee-996c-9b3cd03f27a2","study_title":"AI Meeting Notetakers — Capture Accurate Transcripts, Summaries & Action Items From Live Calls","study_kind":"generation","research_task":"86baxegnv","tested_at":null,"completeness":"input-and-output","input":{"state":"files","text":null,"files":[{"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/547dd6f13e4a420fa8ad7bf2c88c7612.png?v=1","filename":"31-july-meeting-screenshot.png","alt":"AI Demos Daily Standup — 31 July 2026","role":"input"}],"modality":"image","stresses":["Transcription accuracy for real names, tool names, numbers, and technical jargon","Speaker diarization across multiple active speakers","Robustness to overlapping speech, crosstalk, and rapid turn-taking","Join reliability for bot-based and botless capture","Summary quality on identical source material","Action-item extraction with correct owners and commitments","Topic segmentation of standup updates","Search and chat grounded in the meeting content","Sharing, API, MCP, integrations, plan limits, languages, and privacy feature coverage"]},"tool_page_slug":null,"tool_url":null,"permalink":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/9080d7d0-7707-4182-b68c-0e1f61c09488","api_url":"https://ai.aidemos.com/v1/observations/9080d7d0-7707-4182-b68c-0e1f61c09488"},"peers":[{"id":"070f7f5f-046c-4139-a132-6e00a3b57acc","tool":"fathom","tool_name":"Fathom","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Ask Fathom answers direct factual questions from the meeting notes with grounded references; for one query it answered that a call was scheduled for 6th August and linked the supporting transcript mention.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/cc0b830d51cd48a2a6c9121c331b1626.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/070f7f5f-046c-4139-a132-6e00a3b57acc"},{"id":"b8fe3f78-ae35-4ccf-b887-6188bac5ad2f","tool":"fellow","tool_name":"Fellow","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Ask Fellow returned grounded answers to natural-language questions against the meeting notes, and the tested query produced a cited response rather than an unsupported hallucination.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/553c970153974fc9a12d999ec7a3b888.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/b8fe3f78-ae35-4ccf-b887-6188bac5ad2f"},{"id":"633e805b-8efa-4b9f-8667-7b79bb93072c","tool":"granola","tool_name":"Granola","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The chat/Q&A surface gives grounded answers from the meeting record: on the tool-access question it says access was confirmed that day, cites both the notes and transcript, and identifies rerunning testing as the next step.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/8b17d8ed350645bfb4a942128365177f.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/633e805b-8efa-4b9f-8667-7b79bb93072c"},{"id":"09e56c77-5be8-4485-90bc-76a453f3197a","tool":"happyscribe","tool_name":"HappyScribe","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"AI chat answers a meeting question with a grounded transcript-backed response, returning that the call was scheduled for '6th August' and explicitly indicating it is reading the transcription.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/04410e535a0e4f95add9df3c5cd7e79c.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/09e56c77-5be8-4485-90bc-76a453f3197a"},{"id":"75aaf0b0-c9d5-4376-8b81-5b6f2574c0fb","tool":"meetgeek","tool_name":"MeetGeek","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It answers direct grounded questions correctly, but the report records an incorrect answer on a speaker-dependent scheduling question, so chat is reliable for simple queries but weaker when attribution/context matters.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/e84f2cebcccd4af092aff8637baab736.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/75aaf0b0-c9d5-4376-8b81-5b6f2574c0fb"},{"id":"b58378a0-5d37-4751-a711-f2d028fa4401","tool":"notta","tool_name":"Notta","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The Q&A interface answered a natural-language question with a grounded response from the meeting record, including the specific date \"6th August,\" and the report observed no hallucinations.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/a822259cb8bf403a96a2d5814c1b7036.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/b58378a0-5d37-4751-a711-f2d028fa4401"},{"id":"295ea299-5f4d-480e-8ff7-36708e2bc9f7","tool":"otter-ai","tool_name":"Otter.ai","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter’s AI Chat answered meeting questions with a grounded response and a specific timestamp, and the report says the answers were cited and free of hallucinations in the tested queries.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/e5aefd3684124771a718737d9c8d1754.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/295ea299-5f4d-480e-8ff7-36708e2bc9f7"}],"other_criteria":[{"id":"737cde44-da22-4dd6-b985-62104c4d14a8","criterion":"action-item-extraction","criterion_name":"Action-Item Extraction","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Grouped action items by owner, attributed them to the correct team member, and exposed a clickable source timestamp (19:13) for at least one item.","artifact_count":1,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/737cde44-da22-4dd6-b985-62104c4d14a8"},{"id":"f9249df8-2091-492c-b5a9-4f692c3110a9","criterion":"join-method-reliability","criterion_name":"Join Method & Reliability","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Used a bot-based Google Meet join: the Fireflies notetaker appeared in the People panel, and the recording player showed it still present in a 23:40 capture, matching the report’s claim of uninterrupted full-call capture.","artifact_count":5,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/f9249df8-2091-492c-b5a9-4f692c3110a9"},{"id":"fa12c6d7-cdc6-4105-b000-192c2dbebe98","criterion":"search-across-notes","criterion_name":"Search Across Notes","rank_role":"context","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Transcript search worked with exact-match retrieval: a Ctrl+F query for 'API' returned 1/1 match at 20:42 with the hit highlighted and a clickable timestamp.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/fa12c6d7-cdc6-4105-b000-192c2dbebe98"},{"id":"a1eae6d9-4eff-41c0-9357-c4b9c8e6f7fb","criterion":"speaker-diarization","criterion_name":"Speaker Diarization","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Attributed consecutive turns to distinct speakers in the transcript, and the report says speaker identification was almost complete with only minor attribution errors.","artifact_count":3,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/a1eae6d9-4eff-41c0-9357-c4b9c8e6f7fb"},{"id":"2811037e-c564-48ad-a195-593c4e2ed1ea","criterion":"summary-quality","criterion_name":"Summary Quality","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Produced a structured notes summary with a named header ('Task Status and Issue Resolution') rather than a blob, and the report says the full summary was multi-section and did not drop important points.","artifact_count":1,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/2811037e-c564-48ad-a195-593c4e2ed1ea"},{"id":"cc75e1cb-8718-41a2-9065-0ad7df27d332","criterion":"topic-segmentation","criterion_name":"Topic Segmentation","rank_role":"context","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Broke the meeting notes into named sections with descriptive headers and short recap paragraphs, making the output skimmable instead of one undifferentiated block.","artifact_count":1,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/cc75e1cb-8718-41a2-9065-0ad7df27d332"},{"id":"bac222c7-f7cf-4041-8449-df5aa22c88ac","criterion":"transcription-accuracy","criterion_name":"Transcription Accuracy","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Generated a timestamped transcript view, and the report says the full transcript was very accurate: nearly all names, tools, jargon, and numbers were captured correctly with no significant misheard terms or hallucinations.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/bac222c7-f7cf-4041-8449-df5aa22c88ac"}],"appears_in":[{"page_type":"ranking","slug":"ai-meeting-notetakers","title":"Best AI Meeting Notetakers for Accurate Transcripts, Summaries, and Action Items","url":"https://aidemos.com/best/ai-meeting-notetakers","binding":"run"}],"same_scenario":[{"id":"070f7f5f-046c-4139-a132-6e00a3b57acc","tool":"fathom","tool_name":"Fathom","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Ask Fathom answers direct factual questions from the meeting notes with grounded references; for one query it answered that a call was scheduled for 6th August and linked the supporting transcript mention."},{"id":"b8fe3f78-ae35-4ccf-b887-6188bac5ad2f","tool":"fellow","tool_name":"Fellow","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Ask Fellow returned grounded answers to natural-language questions against the meeting notes, and the tested query produced a cited response rather than an unsupported hallucination."},{"id":"633e805b-8efa-4b9f-8667-7b79bb93072c","tool":"granola","tool_name":"Granola","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The chat/Q&A surface gives grounded answers from the meeting record: on the tool-access question it says access was confirmed that day, cites both the notes and transcript, and identifies rerunning testing as the next step."},{"id":"09e56c77-5be8-4485-90bc-76a453f3197a","tool":"happyscribe","tool_name":"HappyScribe","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"AI chat answers a meeting question with a grounded transcript-backed response, returning that the call was scheduled for '6th August' and explicitly indicating it is reading the transcription."},{"id":"75aaf0b0-c9d5-4376-8b81-5b6f2574c0fb","tool":"meetgeek","tool_name":"MeetGeek","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It answers direct grounded questions correctly, but the report records an incorrect answer on a speaker-dependent scheduling question, so chat is reliable for simple queries but weaker when attribution/context matters."},{"id":"b58378a0-5d37-4751-a711-f2d028fa4401","tool":"notta","tool_name":"Notta","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The Q&A interface answered a natural-language question with a grounded response from the meeting record, including the specific date \"6th August,\" and the report observed no hallucinations."},{"id":"295ea299-5f4d-480e-8ff7-36708e2bc9f7","tool":"otter-ai","tool_name":"Otter.ai","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter’s AI Chat answered meeting questions with a grounded response and a specific timestamp, and the report says the answers were cited and free of hallucinations in the tested queries."}]}