{"observation":{"id":"9c65076c-303b-4d4c-a3f7-619f2667c82e","tool":"unstract","tool_name":"Unstract","criterion":"semantic-field-enrichment","criterion_name":"Semantic Field Enrichment","criterion_definition":"Are derived fields — transaction_type, transaction_id, cheque_number, day patterns, ad codes — correctly classified or extracted beyond raw OCR?","criterion_evidence_type":"transformation","criterion_rank_role":"decisive","criterion_rank_role_reason":"This ranking is not just about copying OCR text; it also depends on whether the tool can correctly infer or classify document-specific fields needed for useful structured output. (3 of 3 judges)","scenario":"bank-statement-pdf","scenario_name":"Bank Statement PDF","group_tag":"financial-document-extraction","scenario_description":"A 4-page bank statement PDF with 51 transactions, balances, rewards, and disclaimer text, used to test schema-driven extraction of dense financial tables and multi-page continuity.","modality":"pdf","input_text":null,"input_artifact_refs":[{"alt":null,"url":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/extract-and-query-structured-data-from-d-bank-statement-pdf-25ec532be6e1.pdf","role":"input","filename":"Bank Statement PDF.pdf"}],"stresses":["Table extraction across 50+ transaction rows","Multi-page continuity with BALANCE FORWARD bridges","Structured metadata vs. free-text transaction descriptions","Numerical accuracy for balances, deposits, withdrawals, and summaries","Nested schema population for account, branch, balances, rewards, and disclaimers"],"verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Classifies transaction_type correctly across the transaction array, using Deposit and Withdrawal labels rather than raw OCR text.","evidence_state":"verified","source":null,"artifacts":[{"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/6d9450b3c58b477ea0066e52ceb2f6ca.png?v=1","role":"input","alt":null},{"url":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/unstract-unstract-bank-statement-output-f0bd422ffa9e.json","role":"output","alt":null}],"run_id":"ec4d736d-95f9-4c88-884c-e280435f7b7b","study_title":"Extract and query structured data from documents using natural language","study_kind":"generation","research_task":"86b9y25e5","tested_at":null,"completeness":"input-and-output","input":{"state":"files","text":null,"files":[{"url":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/extract-and-query-structured-data-from-d-bank-statement-pdf-25ec532be6e1.pdf","filename":"Bank Statement PDF.pdf","alt":"Bank Statement PDF","role":"input"}],"modality":"pdf","stresses":["Table extraction across 50+ transaction rows","Multi-page continuity with BALANCE FORWARD bridges","Structured metadata vs. free-text transaction descriptions","Numerical accuracy for balances, deposits, withdrawals, and summaries","Nested schema population for account, branch, balances, rewards, and disclaimers"]},"tool_page_slug":"unstract","tool_url":"https://aidemos.com/tools/unstract","permalink":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/9c65076c-303b-4d4c-a3f7-619f2667c82e","api_url":"https://ai.aidemos.com/v1/observations/9c65076c-303b-4d4c-a3f7-619f2667c82e"},"peers":[{"id":"263dafe2-bc8e-4694-addc-8205206940ba","tool":"datalab","tool_name":"Datalab","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Transaction typing is inconsistent on merged rows, with one 28 Jun entry labeled Deposit despite showing a 399 withdrawal amount and another 19 Jun merged row labeled Deposit/Withdrawal.","artifact_count":3,"thumbnail":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-datalab-bank-statement-extracted-28-jun--04644cff3353.png","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/263dafe2-bc8e-4694-addc-8205206940ba"},{"id":"2c4cdb0a-b344-4604-b614-c97af6d74ea2","tool":"extend-ai","tool_name":"Extend AI","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It classifies bank transactions into derived `transaction_type` values such as Withdrawal or Deposit from the description text.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-extend-ai-transaction-type-5ef541ac7fec.png","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/2c4cdb0a-b344-4604-b614-c97af6d74ea2"},{"id":"a2a1f6f5-e278-415c-afcd-a43a2ec3e91b","tool":"landing-ai","tool_name":"Landing AI","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Adds meaningful transaction_type labels to extracted rows, classifying the sample 18 Jun records as Withdrawal, Withdrawal, and Deposit instead of leaving the field as raw OCR text.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-landing-ai-bank-statement-18-jun-extract-321aa2936cc6.png","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/a2a1f6f5-e278-415c-afcd-a43a2ec3e91b"},{"id":"e10bbd24-0b50-44a1-8902-eb59e2fbaf4f","tool":"llamaparse","tool_name":"LlamaParse","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Fails to derive transaction-level fields, leaving transaction_id and transaction_type empty even for descriptions that encode ATM, UPI, and CRADJ cues.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-llamaparse-bank-statement-transaction-id-c01a0d30b3be.png","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/e10bbd24-0b50-44a1-8902-eb59e2fbaf4f"},{"id":"db96ee62-b038-4189-9112-9ff53de816f8","tool":"nanonets","tool_name":"Nanonets","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It does not populate the derived transaction_type field, leaving it null across the statement instead of classifying deposits and withdrawals.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-bank-statement-2-jul-a511cf7bd0d6.png","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/db96ee62-b038-4189-9112-9ff53de816f8"},{"id":"e2f47c60-3f78-4b14-aa96-2e76d8e2483a","tool":"reducto","tool_name":"Reducto","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Leaves derived transaction metadata incomplete, with transaction_type and transaction_id missing across transaction rows.","artifact_count":3,"thumbnail":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-bank-statement-schema-transactions-00d0c871c403.png","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/e2f47c60-3f78-4b14-aa96-2e76d8e2483a"},{"id":"0067b41d-0138-4fc0-80b1-151bb93e2539","tool":"retab","tool_name":"Retab","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Derives transaction_type and transaction_id on transaction rows, classifying one record as UPI with transaction_id 917615251879 and cheque_number left empty.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-bank-statement-2-jul-a511cf7bd0d6.png","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/0067b41d-0138-4fc0-80b1-151bb93e2539"}],"other_criteria":[{"id":"fc237f3a-5e49-42f5-916c-ceda1f9fee8b","criterion":"extraction-accuracy","criterion_name":"Extraction Accuracy","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Copies header and balance values exactly, including the account holder block, account number, statement date, and the 114,453.65 opening / 116,149.46 closing balances.","artifact_count":4,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/fc237f3a-5e49-42f5-916c-ceda1f9fee8b"},{"id":"9256b7b3-d9fb-4b69-ba61-8ffde0fa3f6d","criterion":"extraction-accuracy","criterion_name":"Extraction Accuracy","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Derives an incorrect summary transaction count, reporting 43 when the statement actually contains 51 rows.","artifact_count":3,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/9256b7b3-d9fb-4b69-ba61-8ffde0fa3f6d"},{"id":"db903e38-5c91-4688-ac04-2930dc9e72ab","criterion":"schema-adherence","criterion_name":"Schema Adherence","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Preserves the requested nested statement hierarchy instead of flattening it, with separate metadata, account_holder, account, branch, balances, transactions, summary, and other top-level sections.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/db903e38-5c91-4688-ac04-2930dc9e72ab"},{"id":"1355f0ad-f96e-476c-9a0d-ab7e11352c1e","criterion":"table-and-record-completeness","criterion_name":"Table & Record Completeness","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Keeps the transaction table intact across all four pages, with the full 51-row record set present and no merged or dropped rows.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/1355f0ad-f96e-476c-9a0d-ab7e11352c1e"}],"appears_in":[{"page_type":"ranking","slug":"document-extraction","title":"Best AI Tools for Extracting Structured Data from PDFs and Business Documents","url":"https://aidemos.com/best/document-extraction","binding":"run"},{"page_type":"tool","slug":"unstract","title":null,"url":"https://aidemos.com/tools/unstract","binding":"run"}],"same_scenario":[{"id":"263dafe2-bc8e-4694-addc-8205206940ba","tool":"datalab","tool_name":"Datalab","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Transaction typing is inconsistent on merged rows, with one 28 Jun entry labeled Deposit despite showing a 399 withdrawal amount and another 19 Jun merged row labeled Deposit/Withdrawal."},{"id":"2c4cdb0a-b344-4604-b614-c97af6d74ea2","tool":"extend-ai","tool_name":"Extend AI","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It classifies bank transactions into derived `transaction_type` values such as Withdrawal or Deposit from the description text."},{"id":"a2a1f6f5-e278-415c-afcd-a43a2ec3e91b","tool":"landing-ai","tool_name":"Landing AI","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Adds meaningful transaction_type labels to extracted rows, classifying the sample 18 Jun records as Withdrawal, Withdrawal, and Deposit instead of leaving the field as raw OCR text."},{"id":"e10bbd24-0b50-44a1-8902-eb59e2fbaf4f","tool":"llamaparse","tool_name":"LlamaParse","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Fails to derive transaction-level fields, leaving transaction_id and transaction_type empty even for descriptions that encode ATM, UPI, and CRADJ cues."},{"id":"db96ee62-b038-4189-9112-9ff53de816f8","tool":"nanonets","tool_name":"Nanonets","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It does not populate the derived transaction_type field, leaving it null across the statement instead of classifying deposits and withdrawals."},{"id":"e2f47c60-3f78-4b14-aa96-2e76d8e2483a","tool":"reducto","tool_name":"Reducto","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Leaves derived transaction metadata incomplete, with transaction_type and transaction_id missing across transaction rows."},{"id":"0067b41d-0138-4fc0-80b1-151bb93e2539","tool":"retab","tool_name":"Retab","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Derives transaction_type and transaction_id on transaction rows, classifying one record as UPI with transaction_id 917615251879 and cheque_number left empty."}]}