{"observation":{"id":"d7084667-c138-440e-ae8a-85055f890e01","tool":"reducto","tool_name":"Reducto","criterion":"table-and-record-completeness","criterion_name":"Table & Record Completeness","criterion_definition":"Are all tabular rows (transactions, line items) extracted without merging, duplication, omission, or phantom records?","criterion_evidence_type":"transformation","criterion_rank_role":"decisive","criterion_rank_role_reason":"For document data extraction, missing, merged, duplicated, or phantom rows directly corrupt the structured dataset and break downstream querying. (3 of 3 judges)","scenario":"bank-statement-pdf","scenario_name":"Bank Statement PDF","group_tag":"financial-document-extraction","scenario_description":"A 4-page bank statement PDF with 51 transactions, balances, rewards, and disclaimer text, used to test schema-driven extraction of dense financial tables and multi-page continuity.","modality":"pdf","input_text":null,"input_artifact_refs":[{"alt":null,"url":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/extract-and-query-structured-data-from-d-bank-statement-pdf-25ec532be6e1.pdf","role":"input","filename":"Bank Statement PDF.pdf"}],"stresses":["Table extraction across 50+ transaction rows","Multi-page continuity with BALANCE FORWARD bridges","Structured metadata vs. free-text transaction descriptions","Numerical accuracy for balances, deposits, withdrawals, and summaries","Nested schema population for account, branch, balances, rewards, and disclaimers"],"verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Does not preserve the repeating transaction table faithfully, returning 53 transaction records for a statement that contains 51 transactions.","evidence_state":"verified","source":null,"artifacts":[{"url":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-reducto-transactions-5f1507b139e2.png","role":"output","alt":null},{"url":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-reducto-extracted-transactions-6831b5a2572e.png","role":"output","alt":null},{"url":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-reducto-output-1-bf8098db170a.json","role":"output","alt":null}],"run_id":"ec4d736d-95f9-4c88-884c-e280435f7b7b","study_title":"Extract and query structured data from documents using natural language","study_kind":"generation","research_task":"86b9y25e5","tested_at":null,"completeness":"input-and-output","input":{"state":"files","text":null,"files":[{"url":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/extract-and-query-structured-data-from-d-bank-statement-pdf-25ec532be6e1.pdf","filename":"Bank Statement PDF.pdf","alt":"Bank Statement PDF","role":"input"}],"modality":"pdf","stresses":["Table extraction across 50+ transaction rows","Multi-page continuity with BALANCE FORWARD bridges","Structured metadata vs. free-text transaction descriptions","Numerical accuracy for balances, deposits, withdrawals, and summaries","Nested schema population for account, branch, balances, rewards, and disclaimers"]},"tool_page_slug":"reducto","tool_url":"https://aidemos.com/tools/reducto","permalink":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/d7084667-c138-440e-ae8a-85055f890e01","api_url":"https://ai.aidemos.com/v1/observations/d7084667-c138-440e-ae8a-85055f890e01"},"peers":[{"id":"67ba5c20-1ac1-4cad-9a54-eae062a19854","tool":"datalab","tool_name":"Datalab","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Can attach a transaction to the wrong date when rows are merged, with an 18 Jun 19 withdrawal appearing under a 19 Jun 19 record in the extracted output.","artifact_count":3,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/80135a758c5a4d2aa2187e8af3f050e8.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/67ba5c20-1ac1-4cad-9a54-eae062a19854"},{"id":"3b66a1fa-5d29-4130-8e37-0c4cdc033160","tool":"extend-ai","tool_name":"Extend AI","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The extractor keeps transaction rows as separate records, and the report says it captured all 51 transactions without merging adjacent rows.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-extend-ai-extracted-transaction-item-4618ec1646be.png","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/3b66a1fa-5d29-4130-8e37-0c4cdc033160"},{"id":"76a18022-79e8-45a6-b3c9-bacd1c8b7330","tool":"landing-ai","tool_name":"Landing AI","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Preserves the full transaction table as 51 separate statement records, without merging rows or dropping entries.","artifact_count":5,"thumbnail":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-landingai-bank-statement-output-d3ff94f60bcb.json","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/76a18022-79e8-45a6-b3c9-bacd1c8b7330"},{"id":"b9bfb6b9-ede4-4ea0-ab6e-68c2c5b3895b","tool":"llamaparse","tool_name":"LlamaParse","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Over-segments the bank-statement transaction table, outputting 54 transaction rows for a statement the report says contains 51 transactions and leaving the summary at 44 total_transactions, so row counts are not self-consistent.","artifact_count":3,"thumbnail":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-llamaparse-bank-statement-transaction-co-ea2cee32bed3.png","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/b9bfb6b9-ede4-4ea0-ab6e-68c2c5b3895b"},{"id":"4ecae670-4417-4bc0-98d5-6f6fe27654e0","tool":"nanonets","tool_name":"Nanonets","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It undercounts the transaction table, extracting 47 transactions when the statement actually contains 51, so 4 records are missing.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-docstrange-nanonets-transaction-count-7b5312c3e84a.png","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/4ecae670-4417-4bc0-98d5-6f6fe27654e0"},{"id":"a0e9e32e-85ea-493d-959a-ab26271ebc7f","tool":"retab","tool_name":"Retab","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Overcounts the transaction table summary: total_transactions is 43, while the report says the expected count is 40 after excluding Balance Forward, tax, and charge entries.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/research-media-retab-bank-statement-total-transactions-c378712469f2.png","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/a0e9e32e-85ea-493d-959a-ab26271ebc7f"},{"id":"1355f0ad-f96e-476c-9a0d-ab7e11352c1e","tool":"unstract","tool_name":"Unstract","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Keeps the transaction table intact across all four pages, with the full 51-row record set present and no merged or dropped rows.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://d3epheqghktydj.cloudfront.net/unstract-unstract-bank-statement-output-f0bd422ffa9e.json","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/1355f0ad-f96e-476c-9a0d-ab7e11352c1e"}],"other_criteria":[{"id":"5ac2276f-3c09-465c-88d0-3a8315e997f4","criterion":"extraction-accuracy","criterion_name":"Extraction Accuracy","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Gets some bank values right but misstates a core aggregate: summary.total_transactions is reported as 70 even though the report says the correct count is 40.","artifact_count":3,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/5ac2276f-3c09-465c-88d0-3a8315e997f4"},{"id":"956bec9e-b310-4628-a049-b04b3e645b5e","criterion":"extraction-accuracy","criterion_name":"Extraction Accuracy","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The tool correctly extracts the bank statement currency as INR and includes citation metadata for that field.","artifact_count":1,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/956bec9e-b310-4628-a049-b04b3e645b5e"},{"id":"95071c07-2f7a-463b-b7c7-3738ddbd3651","criterion":"schema-adherence","criterion_name":"Schema Adherence","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Reconstructs the bank statement into a nested JSON structure aligned to the requested schema, with document metadata, account, branch, statement period, transactions, summary, and rewards-style sections instead of flat OCR text.","artifact_count":6,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/95071c07-2f7a-463b-b7c7-3738ddbd3651"},{"id":"e2f47c60-3f78-4b14-aa96-2e76d8e2483a","criterion":"semantic-field-enrichment","criterion_name":"Semantic Field Enrichment","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Leaves derived transaction metadata incomplete, with transaction_type and transaction_id missing across transaction rows.","artifact_count":3,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/e2f47c60-3f78-4b14-aa96-2e76d8e2483a"},{"id":"2d9d828a-e002-45f9-9dfe-93aef402a5de","criterion":"structural-clean-output","criterion_name":"Structural Clean Output","rank_role":"context","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Exports JSON directly, but the bank workflow is not cleanly consumable end-to-end because the report says the result still needs reconciliation and correction before use.","artifact_count":3,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/2d9d828a-e002-45f9-9dfe-93aef402a5de"}],"appears_in":[{"page_type":"ranking","slug":"document-extraction","title":"Best AI Tools for Extracting Structured Data from PDFs and Business Documents","url":"https://aidemos.com/best/document-extraction","binding":"run"},{"page_type":"tool","slug":"unstract","title":null,"url":"https://aidemos.com/tools/unstract","binding":"run"}],"same_scenario":[{"id":"67ba5c20-1ac1-4cad-9a54-eae062a19854","tool":"datalab","tool_name":"Datalab","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Can attach a transaction to the wrong date when rows are merged, with an 18 Jun 19 withdrawal appearing under a 19 Jun 19 record in the extracted output."},{"id":"3b66a1fa-5d29-4130-8e37-0c4cdc033160","tool":"extend-ai","tool_name":"Extend AI","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The extractor keeps transaction rows as separate records, and the report says it captured all 51 transactions without merging adjacent rows."},{"id":"76a18022-79e8-45a6-b3c9-bacd1c8b7330","tool":"landing-ai","tool_name":"Landing AI","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Preserves the full transaction table as 51 separate statement records, without merging rows or dropping entries."},{"id":"b9bfb6b9-ede4-4ea0-ab6e-68c2c5b3895b","tool":"llamaparse","tool_name":"LlamaParse","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Over-segments the bank-statement transaction table, outputting 54 transaction rows for a statement the report says contains 51 transactions and leaving the summary at 44 total_transactions, so row counts are not self-consistent."},{"id":"4ecae670-4417-4bc0-98d5-6f6fe27654e0","tool":"nanonets","tool_name":"Nanonets","verdict":"failed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It undercounts the transaction table, extracting 47 transactions when the statement actually contains 51, so 4 records are missing."},{"id":"a0e9e32e-85ea-493d-959a-ab26271ebc7f","tool":"retab","tool_name":"Retab","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Overcounts the transaction table summary: total_transactions is 43, while the report says the expected count is 40 after excluding Balance Forward, tax, and charge entries."},{"id":"1355f0ad-f96e-476c-9a0d-ab7e11352c1e","tool":"unstract","tool_name":"Unstract","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Keeps the transaction table intact across all four pages, with the full 51-row record set present and no merged or dropped rows."}]}