{"observation":{"id":"dfeacb85-baa0-4c8b-a44e-e4a7b005d54f","tool":"meetgeek","tool_name":"MeetGeek","criterion":"action-item-extraction","criterion_name":"Action-Item Extraction","criterion_definition":"Finds the real action items, ideally with owner and due date, with low false positives.","criterion_evidence_type":"transformation","criterion_rank_role":"decisive","criterion_rank_role_reason":"Finding the real action items is a central outcome readers are hiring the tool for, not just a convenience feature. (3 of 3 judges)","scenario":"ai-demos-daily-standup-31-july-2026","scenario_name":"AI Demos Daily Standup — 31 July 2026","group_tag":"ai-meeting-notetaker","scenario_description":"A real 25-minute technical engineering daily standup with 14 attendees and about 10 active speakers, used as the single parallel-capture meeting for evaluating AI meeting notetakers on transcription, diarization, summaries, action items, search/chat, and collaboration features.","modality":"image","input_text":null,"input_artifact_refs":[{"alt":null,"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/547dd6f13e4a420fa8ad7bf2c88c7612.png?v=1","role":"input","filename":"31-july-meeting-screenshot.png"}],"stresses":["Transcription accuracy for real names, tool names, numbers, and technical jargon","Speaker diarization across multiple active speakers","Robustness to overlapping speech, crosstalk, and rapid turn-taking","Join reliability for bot-based and botless capture","Summary quality on identical source material","Action-item extraction with correct owners and commitments","Topic segmentation of standup updates","Search and chat grounded in the meeting content","Sharing, API, MCP, integrations, plan limits, languages, and privacy feature coverage"],"verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It extracts real commitments as action items rather than noise; the report says all extracted items had correct ownership and timing, and the visible note includes an owned action item with timestamp 19:51.","evidence_state":"verified","source":null,"artifacts":[{"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/39691e7c2e9141b3aac5a412f3bb110d.png?v=1","role":"output","alt":null}],"run_id":"ace58582-3d1e-48ee-996c-9b3cd03f27a2","study_title":"AI Meeting Notetakers — Capture Accurate Transcripts, Summaries & Action Items From Live Calls","study_kind":"generation","research_task":"86baxegnv","tested_at":null,"completeness":"input-and-output","input":{"state":"files","text":null,"files":[{"url":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/547dd6f13e4a420fa8ad7bf2c88c7612.png?v=1","filename":"31-july-meeting-screenshot.png","alt":"AI Demos Daily Standup — 31 July 2026","role":"input"}],"modality":"image","stresses":["Transcription accuracy for real names, tool names, numbers, and technical jargon","Speaker diarization across multiple active speakers","Robustness to overlapping speech, crosstalk, and rapid turn-taking","Join reliability for bot-based and botless capture","Summary quality on identical source material","Action-item extraction with correct owners and commitments","Topic segmentation of standup updates","Search and chat grounded in the meeting content","Sharing, API, MCP, integrations, plan limits, languages, and privacy feature coverage"]},"tool_page_slug":"meetgeek","tool_url":"https://aidemos.com/tools/meetgeek","permalink":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/dfeacb85-baa0-4c8b-a44e-e4a7b005d54f","api_url":"https://ai.aidemos.com/v1/observations/dfeacb85-baa0-4c8b-a44e-e4a7b005d54f"},"peers":[{"id":"8340c79d-88de-4721-9c3e-c58e057071fb","tool":"fathom","tool_name":"Fathom","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Fathom extracts real commitments into an ACTION ITEMS section with owner attribution; the published output shows timestamped tasks and a named owner on the item.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/9e8a3e7fb669448e959de254a7dcec48.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/8340c79d-88de-4721-9c3e-c58e057071fb"},{"id":"21587b7d-dc6e-4aa1-8ee4-4e5f13641a3e","tool":"fellow","tool_name":"Fellow","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Action-item extraction was mostly correct, with real commitments and proper owner assignment for most items, but one real action item was misplaced from Mahreen to Anshika; the report states a 95%+ capture rate.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/2f38a356a98d4395b43001c1d7f6c5b3.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/21587b7d-dc6e-4aa1-8ee4-4e5f13641a3e"},{"id":"737cde44-da22-4dd6-b985-62104c4d14a8","tool":"fireflies-ai","tool_name":"Fireflies.ai","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Grouped action items by owner, attributed them to the correct team member, and exposed a clickable source timestamp (19:13) for at least one item.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/bd68b01019254a5380cf234ec8ab89a1.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/737cde44-da22-4dd6-b985-62104c4d14a8"},{"id":"9af81f24-1ac8-4a6a-b543-1959eafc22b0","tool":"granola","tool_name":"Granola","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Granola extracts concrete next steps with ownership: the visible action item says to create a subtask and add details, names Mahreen Fathima as owner, and marks the item for same-day follow-up; the report says the extracted list contained no false positives.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/0a21e41b32d648b1b5206dc034a58201.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/9af81f24-1ac8-4a6a-b543-1959eafc22b0"},{"id":"a3626a76-5657-440e-9460-f49e46ad880b","tool":"happyscribe","tool_name":"HappyScribe","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It extracted the real action item about updating logs, but owner attribution was wrong because the misheard name cascaded into the action item and showed 'Nadine' instead of 'Mahreen.'","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/672943809b1d40c483bdee07651023c2.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/a3626a76-5657-440e-9460-f49e46ad880b"},{"id":"1b0800ea-3b02-4159-88c1-ed437a0b12a7","tool":"notta","tool_name":"Notta","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The action-item list extracted the real commitments from the call, formatted them as checkbox items with @mentions, and the report says owner assignment was correct with no false positives.","artifact_count":1,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/22b60eda9b5e4b05b6ad287c471e5e3c.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/1b0800ea-3b02-4159-88c1-ed437a0b12a7"},{"id":"914e606f-d39b-4941-8b42-0f3b3653ee40","tool":"otter-ai","tool_name":"Otter.ai","verdict":"struggled","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter extracted action items, including at least one due-today API-related task with an assignee, but the report says most items were left without an owner and duplicate entries also appeared, so the output needed manual cleanup before delegation.","artifact_count":2,"thumbnail":"https://cdn.futuresmart.ai/public/aidemos/7e0a51fd2a4744aea043309aec25fc20.png?v=1","evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/914e606f-d39b-4941-8b42-0f3b3653ee40"}],"other_criteria":[{"id":"75aaf0b0-c9d5-4376-8b81-5b6f2574c0fb","criterion":"chat-with-notes-ask-questions","criterion_name":"Chat with Notes / Ask Questions","rank_role":"context","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It answers direct grounded questions correctly, but the report records an incorrect answer on a speaker-dependent scheduling question, so chat is reliable for simple queries but weaker when attribution/context matters.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/75aaf0b0-c9d5-4376-8b81-5b6f2574c0fb"},{"id":"0a57537c-4ad4-4b2f-8115-4281f671bd30","criterion":"editability","criterion_name":"Editability","rank_role":"context","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Users can edit generated outputs inline before sharing; the report says summary, action items, and the full transcript are all editable, and the UI shows editable summary text.","artifact_count":1,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/0a57537c-4ad4-4b2f-8115-4281f671bd30"},{"id":"9ebe6fbe-6f09-440e-afde-66593a710483","criterion":"join-method-reliability","criterion_name":"Join Method & Reliability","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The bot successfully joined a Google Meet call and the report says it captured the full ~30-minute meeting with zero disconnections or data loss.","artifact_count":3,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/9ebe6fbe-6f09-440e-afde-66593a710483"},{"id":"e8929c90-b25d-47cf-ab27-f340ed881ef4","criterion":"search-across-notes","criterion_name":"Search Across Notes","rank_role":"context","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It supports transcript search with precise retrieval: searching for \"api\" surfaces the matching text in context and the report says timestamps are returned to within a few seconds.","artifact_count":1,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/e8929c90-b25d-47cf-ab27-f340ed881ef4"},{"id":"4f7e5b21-ff4f-4846-9a07-3219c0659681","criterion":"speaker-diarization","criterion_name":"Speaker Diarization","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It identifies most speakers in a multi-speaker standup, but leaves at least one utterance as \"Unknown speaker\" and misattributes some lines to the wrong speaker, so attribution is not fully reliable.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/4f7e5b21-ff4f-4846-9a07-3219c0659681"},{"id":"b482399a-b91b-4aaa-b6f1-a56363792548","criterion":"summary-quality","criterion_name":"Summary Quality","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It produces a clear, skimmable meeting summary with topic organization and a Next Steps section, and the report says it preserved the major decisions and discussion points.","artifact_count":2,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/b482399a-b91b-4aaa-b6f1-a56363792548"},{"id":"b45a857b-9306-4a29-a568-dcdf9f79fdf2","criterion":"topic-segmentation","criterion_name":"Topic Segmentation","rank_role":"context","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It breaks the meeting into useful numbered topic sections instead of one blob, with a visible hierarchy under \"Topics & Highlights\" and the report also noting an Insights tab alongside the segmentation.","artifact_count":1,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/b45a857b-9306-4a29-a568-dcdf9f79fdf2"},{"id":"5a191ed7-02a9-4979-931d-9219e0b75fce","criterion":"transcription-accuracy","criterion_name":"Transcription Accuracy","rank_role":"decisive","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It transcribes a normal ~25-minute, ~10-active-speaker engineering standup mostly accurately, with only minor proper-noun/term drift noted in the report; one example given is \"Madin\" being misheard for \"Mahreen\".","artifact_count":1,"evidence_url":"https://aidemos.com/evidence/5a191ed7-02a9-4979-931d-9219e0b75fce"}],"appears_in":[{"page_type":"ranking","slug":"ai-meeting-notetakers","title":"Best AI Meeting Notetakers for Accurate Transcripts, Summaries, and Action Items","url":"https://aidemos.com/best/ai-meeting-notetakers","binding":"run"}],"same_scenario":[{"id":"8340c79d-88de-4721-9c3e-c58e057071fb","tool":"fathom","tool_name":"Fathom","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Fathom extracts real commitments into an ACTION ITEMS section with owner attribution; the published output shows timestamped tasks and a named owner on the item."},{"id":"21587b7d-dc6e-4aa1-8ee4-4e5f13641a3e","tool":"fellow","tool_name":"Fellow","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Action-item extraction was mostly correct, with real commitments and proper owner assignment for most items, but one real action item was misplaced from Mahreen to Anshika; the report states a 95%+ capture rate."},{"id":"737cde44-da22-4dd6-b985-62104c4d14a8","tool":"fireflies-ai","tool_name":"Fireflies.ai","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Grouped action items by owner, attributed them to the correct team member, and exposed a clickable source timestamp (19:13) for at least one item."},{"id":"9af81f24-1ac8-4a6a-b543-1959eafc22b0","tool":"granola","tool_name":"Granola","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Granola extracts concrete next steps with ownership: the visible action item says to create a subtask and add details, names Mahreen Fathima as owner, and marks the item for same-day follow-up; the report says the extracted list contained no false positives."},{"id":"a3626a76-5657-440e-9460-f49e46ad880b","tool":"happyscribe","tool_name":"HappyScribe","verdict":"mixed","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"It extracted the real action item about updating logs, but owner attribution was wrong because the misheard name cascaded into the action item and showed 'Nadine' instead of 'Mahreen.'"},{"id":"1b0800ea-3b02-4159-88c1-ed437a0b12a7","tool":"notta","tool_name":"Notta","verdict":"worked","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"The action-item list extracted the real commitments from the call, formatted them as checkbox items with @mentions, and the report says owner assignment was correct with no false positives."},{"id":"914e606f-d39b-4941-8b42-0f3b3653ee40","tool":"otter-ai","tool_name":"Otter.ai","verdict":"struggled","score":null,"score_total":null,"note":"Otter extracted action items, including at least one due-today API-related task with an assignee, but the report says most items were left without an owner and duplicate entries also appeared, so the output needed manual cleanup before delegation."}]}